APA Style
Ömer Fırat TURŞUCULAR. (2025). A Mini Review on Used Medical Yarns in the Braiding Production Methods for Biomaterial Applications. Biomaterials Connect, 2 (Article ID: 0011). https://doi.org/10.69709/BIOMATC.2024.108100MLA Style
Ömer Fırat TURŞUCULAR. "A Mini Review on Used Medical Yarns in the Braiding Production Methods for Biomaterial Applications". Biomaterials Connect, vol. 2, 2025, Article ID: 0011, https://doi.org/10.69709/BIOMATC.2024.108100.Chicago Style
Ömer Fırat TURŞUCULAR. 2025. "A Mini Review on Used Medical Yarns in the Braiding Production Methods for Biomaterial Applications." Biomaterials Connect 2 (2025): 0011. https://doi.org/10.69709/BIOMATC.2024.108100.Volume 2, Article ID: 2025.0011
Ömer Fırat TURŞUCULAR
omerfirattursucular@gmail.com
1 R&D in Chief, Hatin Textile and Hatin Tex Weaving Companies, DOSAB, 16245 Bursa, Turkey 0000-0003-1162-0742
Received: 10 Nov 2024 Accepted: 15 Jan 2025 Available Online: 15 Jan 2025 Published: 28 Feb 2025
Biomaterials are advanced materials that can be implanted within the body, depending on the required design criteria, usually as a result of the production of polymeric-based, and medical yarns by the braiding method. Braiding method is widely used in the production of biomaterials due to its advantages, including a high elastic modulus, high tensile strength, and high dimensional stability properties. The high biological and mechanical properties required in biomaterials depend on the yarn type, yarn count (dtex), braid yarn count, braid ply number, braid angle (°), and braiding structure (2-D, or 3-D) such as some braiding production process parameters. When UHMWPE, PET, HT PET, and PP multifilament yarns are used, they increase the mechanical values in the axial direction in biomaterials. The addition of ELA yarn significantly increases the maximum percentage of breaking elongation. When PGA, PLGA, and PDO multifilament yarns are used, the resorption period is between 2 and 12 months. When PA 6, PA 6.6, HDPE, UHMWPE, PP, PET, PVDF, and PTFE multifilament yarns are used, the resorption period is permanent. In order to shorten the rehabilitation period, biological chemicals such as CHI, COL, and HA can be coated on these structures by impregnation method. Afterwards, the sterilization process must be applied, and FDA approval must be also obtained. Finally, they are widely used in artificial surgical suture, artificial ligament, artificial tendon, and artificial vein applications.
The main purpose of this theoretical mini-review study is to determine the effects of the braiding production method used in biomaterials for the usage areas of medical yarns in braiding structured biomaterials, considering the types of yarns used and the associated process parameters. Braiding method used in the production of biomaterials provides higher elasticity modulus, higher tensile strength, and higher dimensional stability compared to foam/sponge, non-woven surfaces, weaving, and knitting methods [1]. Furthermore, when a 3-D braiding structure is employed, an increase in yarn count (dtex), braid yarn count, and braid ply number, coupled with a decrease in braid angle (°), enhances the mechanical properties in the axial direction [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Moreover, maximum mechanical values are observed when using yarn counts of 1112 dtex, 1670 dtex, and 3330 dtex [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. When UHMWPE, PET, HT PET, and PP multifilament yarns, which have high elasticity modulus, maximum breaking force, and high mechanical properties in the axial direction, are used, the mechanical values in the axial direction also increase [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,22,23]. When ELA yarn is added, the maximum percent breaking elongation value increases as well [8]. When thermoplastic structured PGA, PLGA, and PDO multifilament yarns with low thermal properties are used, the resorption period is between 2 and 12 months. Moreover, when thermoplastic structured PA 6, PA 6.6, HDPE, UHMWPE, PP, PET, PVDF, and PTFE multifilament yarns with relatively higher thermal properties are used, the resorption time is permanent [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,22,23]. Biological chemicals such as CHI, COL, and HA add biological functionality to these yarns by impregnation method. This positively influences the development of the tissue-implant interface, thereby shortening the rehabilitation period. The resulting interface is biocompatible, non-toxic, non-carcinogenic, non-allergenic, and does not cause infection, symptoms, or trauma [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. These yarns are generally used in artificial surgical sutures, artificial ligaments, artificial tendons and, artificial vein applications [7,8,9,10,11,12,13].
Biomaterials have been officially approved by the FDA of the USA in accordance with internationally valid ISO and ASTM standards, and their main functions are to protect the damaged areas of the body (such as heart, vessel, ligament, tendon, surgical yarn, graft, brain, eye, teeth, hair, skin, neck, spine, hip, cartilage, knee, arm, leg, foot, joint, rib cage, lung, liver, kidney, stomach, intestine, pancreas, genital area, plate or screw) for a certain period of time. They are artificial biological materials that support the development of the cell/tissue-implant interface. They are produced based on biomechanical design criteria, sterilized, and manufactured using various production methods from natural or synthetic raw materials to meet the specific needs of the body [22,24,25,27,29]. Biomaterial applications began with the application of surgical suture in 4000 BC for the first time in world history [1,26]. In another source, surgical suture was used as a biomaterial application for the first time in Egypt in the 1100s BC [18]. Moreover, its value has been increasing in the modern era since the 1960s [23,25]. Chemical sterilization is generally applied to biomaterials with alcohol-based chemicals [1]. Although the design criteria of biomaterials vary depending on the specific needs of the damaged area within the body, they generally include high modulus of elasticity, low Poisson’s ratio, high radial strength, high tensile (rupture, or fracture) strength, high compressive strength, high bending strength, high impact strength, high shear strength and high fatigue strength. Additionally, they require low creep strength, high force carrying capacity, appropriate elasticity, cheapness, fiber distribution, low density (lightness), easy raw material availability, and ease of production and implantation. Other factors include suitable yarn type, suitable yarn count, appropriate yarn cross-section, appropriate yarn structure, appropriate yarn coefficient, appropriate twist amount, appropriate fabric type, appropriate fabric construction, appropriate fabric density values, production method angle, appropriate geometric shape, appropriate porosity, appropriate porosity size, high and homogeneous porosity distribution. Further, biomaterials should exhibit appropriate length, appropriate diameter, high biocompatibility, biodegradability, sometimes high bioinertness depending on the intrabody site, surface roughness, high wear resistance, high corrosion resistance, high chemical resistance, high pH resistance, blood pressure resistance, high dimensional stability, high tissue-implant interface bond, high cell-tissue interface development support, fibroin-based protein support, cell encapsulation support, being able to carry drugs, closing wounds, supporting tissue integration, and supporting cell/tissue adhesion. Moreover, ideal biomaterials should prevent blood clotting, infections, and adverse symptoms; support rapid rehabilitation; and not cause trauma or immunological reactions. They should also be blood-compatible, osteogenic, angiogenic, non-thrombogenic, antimicrobial, antitoxic, anticancer, antitumor, and antipathogenic [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Biomaterials can be produced primarily from polymeric, metallic, ceramic, composite materials and cell-tissue based materials [24]. Polymeric materials are chitosan (CHI), collagen (COL), alginate (ALG), gelatin (GEL), heparin (UFH), hyaluronic acid (HA), chondroitin sulfate (GAG), N-butyl cyanoacrylate, N-butyl cyanoacrylate, agarose (AGA), carbon (C), glass (G), polyparaphenyleneterephthalamide (PPD-T), cotton (CO), silk (SI), spider silk (SSI), linen (LI), hemp (FL), jute (J), ramie (R), viscose rayon (CMD), lyocell (LYO), elastane (EL), ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), polyacetal (PAc), polyamide (PA), polycarbonate (PC), polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyurethane (PU), polystyrene (PS), palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polytriethylene terephthalate (PTT), polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), polybutylene succinate (PBS), polydioxanone (PDS), plastic optical fibers (POF), polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA), polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), polybutylene adipateterephthalate (PBAT), polyethyleneglycol (PEG), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), polyvinylalcohol (PVA), polycaprolactone (PCL), polylactic acid (PLA), polyglycolic acid (PGA), polyglactin (PGLA), poly L-lactic acid (PLLA), poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA), polyaryletherketone (PAEK), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polyetherketoneketone (PEKK), polyvinylidenedi-fluoride (PVDF), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), poly(2-hydroxyethyl meth-acrylate) (PHEMA) and polysiloxane materials [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Metallic materials are stainless steel (SS), titanium (Ti), titanium alloys (TiO2, Ti-6Al-4V, Ti-6Al-7Nb, Ti-15Mo-5Zr-3Al), cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) alloys (Co-Cr-Mo, Co-Cr-W-Ni, Co-Ni-Cr-Mo, Co-Cr-Ni-Mo-Fe, Co-Ni-Cr-Mo-W-Fe), NiTi, tantalum (Ta)), and tungsten (W) materials [3,17,24,25]. Ceramic materials are mostly calcium phosphate (CaP) based hydroxyapatite (HA), tricalcium phosphate (TCP), high purity alumina (Al), aluminum zirconia rich alumina (ZTA), yttria stabilized zirconia (YSZ), and bioactive glass (BG) materials [24,25,26]. Composite materials are materials produced by combining polymeric, metallic and ceramic materials [20,21,23,24,25,26]. In biomaterial applications, carbon and glass yarns are commonly used with thermal processing (curing) in combination with epoxy, vinyl ester, and unsaturated polyester resins [20]. The production methods of biomaterials vary depending on the type of raw material used such as polymeric, metallic, ceramic or composite materials. Their production methods are monofilament or multi-filament yarns, braiding, weaving, knitting, non-woven surface, embroidery, sol-gel, electrospinning, coating, plasma, various casting methods, various infusion methods, CVD, and 3-D printing methods [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Produced forms of biomaterials are nanorods, rods, cylindrical structures, plates, biofilms, foams, sponges, cheesecloths, yarns, ropes, fabrics, gels, and solid materials with the desired profile geometry [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Effective production process parameters in the production methods of biomaterials are concentration, atom types, interatomic distance, bond types and bond strengths, polymerization degree, molecular weight, molecular chain configuration and conformation, glass transition temperature, crystallization temperature, melting temperature, decomposition temperature, temperature, time, pressure and environmental conditions [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. The applications of biomaterials are orthopedic, heart, vein, ligament, tendon, surgical yarn, graft, brain, eye, tooth, hair, skin, neck, spine, hip, cartilage, knee, arm, leg, foot, joint, rib cage, lung, liver, kidney, stomach, intestine, pancreas, genital area, plate and screws [1,2,3,14,15,16,17,18,19,22,23,24,25,26,29,30]. Application areas of biomaterials are presented in Table 1 [26]. Application areas of biomaterials [26].
Non-Implanted
Extracorporeal Implants
Healthcare/Hygiene Products
wound dressing
bandage
plaster
lint-free waddingartificial kidney
artificial liver-liver
artificial lungsurgical gown
surgical sheath
bedding
clothes
baby diaper/baby
sheet
clothes/
handkerchief
surgical socks
Soft tissue implants
PP and PET
warp knitting
abdominal wall
ePTFE
nonwoven surfaces
hernia treatment
PLA, PGA, PCL and PDO
nonwoven surfaces
hernia treatment
Chitin
nonwoven surfaces
artificial skin
PMMA and Silicon
nonwoven surfaces
eye contact lens and artificial cornea
COL
nonwoven surfaces
eye contact lens and artificial cornea
Orthopedic Implants
Silicon and PE
weaving and braiding
artificial joint/bone
PE, PP, PES, PTFE, SI and COL
weaving and braiding
artificial tendon
PES, C and COL
braiding
artificial ligament
LDPE
braiding
artificial cartilage
CHI
nonwoven surfaces
bone regeneration
Cardiovascular grafts
PES and PTFE
weaving and knitting
vascular graft
PLA, PLGA and COL
braiding
heart valve and blood vessel
PES, PU and PGA
nonwoven surfaces
heart valve and blood vessel
Sutures
COL, PLA and PGA
monofilament
biodegradable surgical sutures
PES, PA, PE, PP and PTFE
braiding
non-biodegradable surgical sutures
Various technical properties of some polymeric-based yarns commonly used in biomaterials are presented in Table 2 [22,23].
Polymer Type
Chemical Structure and Physical
Production Method and Application
Applications
Resorption Time
PA 6
thermoplastic, hydrophobic, Tg = 45 °C, Tm = 220 °C and % 50 crystallinity
melt spinning production method in monofilament or multifilament yarn form
surgical sutures applications
permanent
PA 6.6
thermoplastic, hydrophobic, Tg = 50 °C, Tm = 265 °C and 50% crystallinity
melt spin-ning pro-duction method in monofila-ment or multifila-ment yarn form
surgical sutures applications
permanent
HDPE
thermoplastic, hydrophobic, Tg = 50 °C, Tm = 125 °C and crystallinity up to 85%
melt spinning method and reinforcement of polymer composites
orthopedic and craniofacial applications
permanent
UHMWPE
thermoplastic, hydrophobic, Tm = between 140 °C and 150 °C, above 95% crystallinity, high modulus of elasticity tensile strength
sol-gel spinning method and very high tensile strength
ligament and force bearing applications
permanent
PP
thermoplastic, hydrophobic, isotactic, Tm = between 165 °C and 175 °C and also crystallinity between 40 and 46%
nonwoven surfaces with melt spinning method and monofilament, hollow, spunbold and melt-blown production methods
surgical sutures, hernia treatment, mesh and blood filter applications
permanent
PET
thermoplastic, hydrophobic, Tg = between 65 °C and 105 °C, Tm = 265 °C and crystallinity up to 100%
melt spinning method and weaving, knitting and braiding applications in monofilament or multifilament yarn form
surgical sutures, hernia treatment, ligament, heart valve, vascular graft and endo-vascular graft applications
permanent
PVDF
thermoplastic, hydrophobic, Tm = between 165 °C and 175 °C and crystallinity between 52 and 66%
melt spinning production method in monofilament or multifilament yarn form
surgical sutures, vascular graft, and endo-vascular graft, heart valve, embolic vena cava filter, ligament applications
permanent
PTFE
thermoplastic, hydrophobic, Tg = 45 °C, Tm = 325 °C and crystallinity between 50 and 75%
melt spinning production method in monofilament or multifilament yarn form
surgical sutures
permanent
PCL
thermoplastic, in rubber form at room temperature, Tg = −65 °C, Tm = between 58 °C and 63 °C
melt spinning production method in monofilament or multifilament yarn form and electro-spinning production method in nanofiber form
tissue scaffolding applications
above 24 months
PLA
thermoplastic, Tg = between 60 °C and 65 °C, Tm = between 173 °C and 178 °C
melt spinning production method in monofilament or multifilament yarn form and electro-spinning production method in nanofiber form
graft, drug delivery and tissue scaffolding applications
above 24 months
PGA
thermoplastic, Tg = between 40 °C and 45 °C, Tm = 225 °C and crystallinity between 45% and 55%
melt spinning production method in monofilament or multifilament yarn form and electro-spinning production method in nanofiber form
surgical sutures, mesh and tissue scaffold applications
between 2 and 12 months
PDO
thermoplastic, Tg = between −10 °C and 0 °C, Tm = between 110 °C and 115 °C and 55% crystallinity
melt spinning production method in monofilament or multifilament yarn form and electro-spinning in nanofiber form
surgical sutures, intramedullary pins; binding clip applications
between 6 and 9 months
PLGA
thermoplastic, Tg = between 35 °C and 60 °C, Tm = between 120 °C and 200 °C
melt spinning production method in monofilament or multifilament yarn form
surgical sutures, vascular graft, and endo-vascular graft applications
between 2 and 5 months
SI
wet spinning production method, suitable for bicomponent fiber production, hydrophobic, 70% crystal-linite, low elastic recovery behavior
wet production method for removing the sericin part of the raw fiber secreted by the Bombix Mori silkworm.
surgical sutures
between 1 and 2 years
CMD
dry or wet spinning production method, hydrophobic, Td = 250 °C and 33% crystallinity
it is produced in the form of multifilament yarn from alkaline cellulose xanthate solution and generally by wet spinning production method.
wound dressing applications
permanent
The textile structures used in biomaterials are the most commonly used textile structures are braiding, weaving and knitting textile structures. [4,5,7,8,9,10,11,13,14,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30].
Braiding structures are produced by the mutual sinusoidal movement of braid beds positioned opposite each other at 180° of at least two yarn groups. Moreover, the unit cell structure is more closed and rigid compared to all other textile production methods except weaving [1,2,3,4,5,6,16,18,19,20,21,22,23,27,30]. Braiding structures can be produced by vertical or horizontal production methods in various geometries, especially round, square, rectangular, hexagonal, H, I, J, and T cross-section profiles [2,3,4,5,20,21]. The hexagonal profile enables the production of the densest braiding structures as it ensures that the braiding formation point with braid coils is reduced to a minimum distance [2]. Moreover, although 1 × 1 (diamond), 2 × 2 (regular) and 3 × 3 (hercules) braiding constructions are widely used, they can be also produced as 2-D, or 3-D braiding structures with 5 × 5 braid beds, and different braiding constructions [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,20,21]. For 3-D braiding structures, either a center yarn or center yarns are added, or a mandrel with various geometric profiles that can be solid or empty is added [2,3,4]. 3-D braiding structures have higher yarn density and tensile strength values compared to 2D braiding structures [14,25,26,27,28]. The most effective production parameters in the production of braiding structures are unit cell cage geometry, number of braid yarns, number of center yarns, fiber and yarn diameters, yarn type, yarn number, cross-section of the yarn, number of filaments in the yarn and twist amount, yarn coefficient, yarn-count, surface area of the yarn intersection, yarn route length, yarn tension, covering factor, braid angle, braid bed geometry, revolution and speed of the head gears in the braid bed and draft ratio of the gears [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,20,21]. The yarn types used in braiding structures are PA, PE, PP, PET, PAN, PCL, PLLA, ePTFE, C, G, PPD-T, UHMWPE, NiTi, and Al2O3 [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,20,21]. The yarn numbers used in braiding structures can be used in yarn counts of 1112 dtex, 1240 dtex, 1670 dtex, 2200 dtex, 3300 dtex, 3400 dtex, and 10,000 dtex [2,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Carbon yarn applications are excluded. 12k filament count is used in biomaterial applications of carbon yarn [2,4,20]. Although the number of braid yarns is commonly produced in the range of 3 to 48 braid yarns, it can also be produced in the number of braid yarns of 24, 32, 48, 64, 80, 96, or 144 depending on the desired biomechanical performance value in the biomaterial application field [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Braiding structures are widely used in artificial surgical suture, artificial ligament, artificial tendon, artificial vessel and artificial bone applications [2,3,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Although it is known that braiding structures can theoretically be produced with braid angles between 1° and 179° in the production of biomaterials, it is generally common and recommended to produce them with braid angles of 30°, 45°, and 60° from experimental studies [2,3,4,5,6,20,21]. The 45° braid angle provides maximum tensile strength and yarn density, while the 60° braid angle provides minimum labor and maximum production speed in biomaterial applications of braiding structures [4,6,20]. Moreover, braiding structures are produced in the diameter range of 5 mm to 24 mm, especially for artificial vascular applications [2].
Woven structures are produced by placing at least two yarn groups (warp and weft yarns) against each other at an angle of 90° and combining them with a beat-up motion. Moreover, the unit cell structure is more closed and rigid compared to all other textile production methods [1,16,22,23,27,28,30].
Knitted structures are primarily divided into warp and weft knitting methods. In warp knitting, they are produced by feeding each yarn to the warp knitting machine separately and creating a closed chain loop structure depending on the loop form of the needle bed. Moreover, the unit cell structure is more closed and less elastic compared to weft knitting [1,16,22,23,27,28,30]. In weft knitting, the yarn is fed to the circular knitting machine from a single point, where it forms an integral loop structure based on the loop configuration of the needle bed. Moreover, the unit cell structure is more open and flexible [1,16,22,23,27,28,30]. As the yarn count increases, the fabric density values increase, the skipping behavior of the yarns forming the fabric is minimized, and the yarn intersection points increase, the pore size of the biomaterials decreases, the number of pores increases, and cell adhesion and proliferation increases. Shear (shear) strength decreases while tensile strength increases [1,16,18,19,22,23,26,29,30]. Comparative biomechanical technical analysis of textile structures used in biomaterials is presented in Table 3 [1]. Comparative biomechanical technical analysis of textile structures used in biomaterials [1].
Technical Specifications
Foam/Sponge
Nonwoven Surfaces
Woven
Braiding
Knitted
Elasticity modulus
Low
Low
High
High
Medium
Tensile strength
Low
Low
High
High
Low
Dimensional stability
Good
From weak to good
Excellent
Excellent
From weak to good
Drapeness
Low
İyi
From weak to good
Low
Excellent
Other technical features
Isotropic behavior
Isotropic behavior
Anisotropic, high fiber parallelism, fiber normally weak
Anisotropic, high biomechanical properties in the axial direction and low in the radial direction
Tendency from isotropic to anisotropic behavior
Various yarns produced by the braiding production method in biomaterial applications and their technical properties have been compiled from literature sources [7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. In an artificial surgical suture application, raw samples were produced with SI as yarn type, 124 tex as yarn count, single-layer (x1), 1 × 1 (diamond) as braiding construction, 16 braid yarns and 2-D braiding structure. After this, they were coated with CHI concentration (c%) for its 1, 2, and 3, at used 100 °C temperature for 10 min. According to experimental results, the dynamic friction coefficient was lower in CHI-coated samples compared to non-CHI-coated samples. As the CHI concentration increased, tensile strength, knot strength and anti-microbial activity increased [7]. In an artificial ACL ligament application, raw samples were produced with HT PET, and EL as yarn types, 1670 dtex, 2200 dtex, and 3300 dtex for HT PET as yarn count, and 420 dtex, 960 dtex, and 1280 dtex for EL as yarn count, four-ply (x4), 1 × 1 (diamond) as braiding construction, 1 center yarn and 16 braid yarns, from 40° to 61° braid angle, and 3-D braiding structure. According to experimental results, as the braid angle increased, axial tensile strength values decreased, while the percentage of elongation at break increased. Moreover, these values were much more evident in samples with EL compared to samples with only HT PET. While the axial tensile strength values decreased for both HT PET, and EL yarn types as the yarn count increased, the percent elongation at break values remained almost unchanged for the HT PET yarn but increased for the EL yarn type [8]. In an artificial Achilles tendon application, raw samples were produced with PET, and PP as yarn types, 1112 dtex for PET as yarn count and 1200 dtex for PP as yarn count, double-layer (x2), 1 × 1 (diamond) and 2 × 2 (regular) as braiding constructions, 1 center yarn and 16 braid yarns, 10° to 60° braid angle, and 3-D braiding structure. According to experimental results, as the braid angle increased, the braid diameter decreased. Axial tensile strength, modulus of elasticity, maximum breaking force, and maximum percent elongation at break increased as the number of yarns increased. Moreover, PET as yarn type had all these biomechanical values higher than PP as yarn type. PET as yarn type creep, and fatigue strength values were higher than PP as yarn type [9]. In an artificial ACL ligament application, raw samples were produced with UHMWPE, PPD-T, and HT PET as yarn types, 445 dtex for UHMWPE as yarn count and 1670 dtex for PPD-T, and HT PET as yarn count, single-layer (x1), 1 × 1 (diamond) and 2 × 2 (regular) as braiding constructions, 1 center yarn and 16 braid yarns, 45° braid angle, and 3-D braiding structure. CHI (c = 2%), and GA (c = 25%) chemicals were first dissolved in solution at pH between 5 and 5.5, 70 °C temperature, and 3 hours as a biofinishing process, then they were absorbed and coated for 0.5 h. A biological in-vitro environment was then created using PBS solution. Finally, the materials were sterilized through EtO sterilization. FT-IR chemical technical analysis was performed. According to experimental results, the most common bond formations were observed as HT PET > PPD-T > UHMWPE, respectively. It was reported that the reasons for this were yarn types, chemical structures of the yarns, bond types, molecular weights, crystallinity, reactivity, ease of diffusion and diffusion rate [10]. In an artificial surgical suture application, raw samples were produced with PA 6.6 as yarn type, 44 dtex as yarn count, 23 as filament count, single, double and triple ply (x1, x2 and x3), 1 × 1 (diamond) as braiding construction, 1, 2, and 3 center yarn, and omly 12 and 16 braids, 350 t/m, 500 t/m, and 650 t/m as twist amounts and 3-D braiding structure. According to experimental results, as the number of braid yarns, number of yarn layers and twist amount increased, braid diameter, tensile strength and knot strength values increased. Node activity first decreased, then increased, and finally decreased again. Deformation recovery (elastic recovery) behavior varied [11]. In an artificial ligament and tendon application, raw samples were produced with PCL, and UHMWPE as yarn types, 110 deniers as yarn count and 32 as filament count for PCL and 100 denier 82 as filament count for UMWPE, PCL/UHMWPE ratio 100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75, and 0/100 ratios, respectively. They had also single-layer (x1), 1 × 1 (diamond) as braiding construction, 4 + 4 and 8 braid yarns and a 2-D braiding structure. According to experimental results, as the PCL/UHMWPE ratio went from 100/0 to 0/100, the modulus of elasticity, maximum breaking force, axial tensile strength, creep strength, fatigue strength and knot strength values increased, but the maximum percent elongation at break values decreased. The general result was that the PCL/UHMWPE with 2-D braiding structures for their 50/50 and 25/75 ratios were reported to have optimum mechanical results [12]. In an artificial bone application, raw samples were produced with PLA as yarn type, 75,150 and 300 deniers as yarn numbers, 36 as filament count, double, three and four layers (x2, x3 and x4), 1 × 1 (diamond) as braiding construction, 16 braid yarns, and 2-D braiding structure. Then, they were impregnated and coated with 3% concentration of CHI at pH 7 at a temperature range of 20 °C to 22 °C for 6 hours. According to experimental results, it was determined that 150 denier 4-ply PLA yarn had the maximum elasticity modulus, maximum breaking force and axial maximum tensile strength values. Moreover, it was observed that thermal degradation began after 70 days. It was also determined that CHI-coated PLA samples produced less Ca+2 ion. It was reported that the reason for this was that CHI vibrated the carbonyl group on the PLA structure at a wavelength of 1730 cm−1, thus accelerating its conversion to Ca+2 [13].
Biomaterials have increased their importance and use in the body since the 1960s until today. The raw materials used in biomaterials are generally structures in the form of yarns produced by the 3-D braiding production method. In addition to polymeric materials, they can be used in metallic, ceramic and composite materials. The materials produced in this way are typically used in applications such as artificial surgical sutures, artificial ligaments, artificial tendons, artificial blood vessels, and artificial bone. UHMWPE, PPD-T, HT PET, PET, PP, PLA, and PCL yarns are widely used. It has been determined from experimental studies that they are affected by yarn’s chemical, yarn’s mechanical, yarn’s thermal and yarn’s biological properties, yarn type, yarn count, number of yarn layers, twist amount, center and braid yarn count, braid angle, braiding construction and biofinishing process for biomechanical performance values in biomaterials. After production, it must be subjected to a sterilization process. Chemical sterilization, particularly using alcohol-based chemicals, is the most commonly employed sterilization method. When C, G, UHMWPE, PPD-T, HT PET, and PET yarns are used to have high values for biomechanical performance values in biomaterials. When the high biological performance values are desired in biomaterials. It is recommended to use PLA, PGA, PCL, and PLGA yarns. The biomaterials produced should not cause various complications, and symptoms within the body, and should support the rapid rehabilitation process. Official approval is required from the FDA in US.
CHI: Chitosan; COL: Collagen; ALG: Alginat; GEL: Gelatin; UFH: Heparin; HA: Hyaluronic Acid; GAG: Chondroitin Sulfate; AGA: Agarose; C: Carbon; G: Glass; PPD-T: Polyparaphenyleneterephthalamide; CO: Cotton; SI: Silk; SSI: Spider Silk; LI: Linen; HE: Hemp; J: Jute; R: Ramie; CMD: Viscose Rayon; LYO: Lyocell; EL: Elastane; UHMWPE: Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene; Pac: Polyacetal; PA: Polyamide; PC: Polycarbonate; PE: Polyethylene; PP: Polypropylene; PU: Polyurethane; PS: Polystyrene; PEA: Palmitoylethanolamide; PET: Polyethylene Terephthalate; PTT: Polytriethyleneterephthalate; PBT: Polybutyleneterephthalate; PBS: Polybutylenesuccinate; PDS: Polydioxanone; POF: Plastic Optical Fibers; PDMS: Polydimethylsiloxane; PHA: Polyhydroxyalkanoates; PHB: Polyhydroxybutyrate; PHBV: Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate); PBAT: Polybutyleneadipateterephthalate; PEG: Polyethyleneglycol; PVP: Polyvinylpyrrolidone; PVA: Polyvinylalcohol; PCL: Polycaprolactone; PLA: Polylactic Acid; PGA: Polyglycolic Acid; PGLA: Polyglactin; PLLA: Poly L-lactic Acid; PLGA: Poly Lactic-co-glycolic Acid; PAEK: Polyaryletherketone; PEEK: Polyetheretherketone; PEKK: Polyetherketoneketone; PVDF: Polyvinylidenedifluoride; PTFE: Polytetrafluoroethylene; PMMA: Polymethylmethacrylate; PHEMA: Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate); SS: Stainless Steel; Ti: Titanium; Co-Cr: Cobalt-Chrome; NiTi: Nitinol; Ta: Tantalum; W: Tungsten; CaP: Calcium Phosphate; HA: Hydroxyapatite; TCP: Tricalcium Phosphate; Al: High Purity Alumina; ZTA: Aluminum Zirconia Rich Alumina; YSZ: Yttria Stabilized Zirconia; BG: Bioactive Glass
The author is solely responsible for methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation writing-original draft preparation, writing-review and editing, project administration, funding acquisition, The author has read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
No person or institution has provided financial support for this technical compilation study prepared by the author on the application areas of all biomaterials produced by the medical yarn-based and braiding production method used in the field of biomaterials.
Declared none.
[1] B. Gupta, N. Grover, S. Viju, S. Saxena, "Polyester and nylon based textiles in biomedical engineering," in Polyesters and Polyamides, , Eds. Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2008, pp. 441-504.
[2] C. Emonts, N. Grigat, F. Merkord, B. Vollbrecht, A. Idrissi, J. Sackmann, et al., "Innovation in 3D braiding technology and its applications" Textiles, vol. 1, pp. 185-205, 2021. [Crossref]
[3] D. Aibibu, M. Hild, C. Cherif, "An overview of braiding structure in medical textile: Fiber-based implants and tissue engineering," in Advances in Braiding Technology, Specialized Techniques and Applications, , Eds. Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2016, pp. 171-190.
[4] K. Bilisik, "Three-dimensional braiding for composites: A review" Text. Res. J., vol. 83, pp. 1414-1436, 2013. [Crossref]
[5] N. Jiang, H. Hu, "Auxetic yarn made with circular braiding technology" Phys. Status Solidi (b), vol. 256, p. 1800168, 2019. [Crossref]
[6] A. Rawal, H. Saraswat, A. Sibal, "Tensile response of braided structures: A review" Text. Res. J., vol. 85, pp. 2083-2096, 2015. [Crossref]
[7] S. Viju, G. Thilagavathi, "Effect of chitosan coating on the characteristics of silk-braided sutures" J. Ind. Text., vol. 42, pp. 256-268, 2013. [Crossref]
[8] S. Turki, S. Marzougui, S.B. Abdessalem, "Optimization of polyester–elastane-braided ligaments performances" J. Ind. Text., vol. 46, pp. 101-115, 2016. [Crossref]
[9] D.S. Morais, J. Cruz, R. Fangueiro, H. Lopes, R.M. Guedes, M.A. Lopes, "Mechanical behavior of ropes based on polypropylene (PP) and poly (ethylene terephthalate)(PET) multifilament yarns for Achilles tendon partial substitution" J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 106, 2020. [Crossref]
[10] Ö.F. Turşucular, U. Yusuf, "An experimental study for chemical characterization of artificial anterior cruciate ligament with coated chitosan as biomaterial" Open Chem., vol. 21, p. 20220324, 2023. [Crossref]
[11] F. Debbabi, S.B. Abdessalem, "New approach for appreciating the surgeon's satisfaction of braided sutures" J. Ind. Text., vol. 46, pp. 1319-1341, 2017. [Crossref]
[12] Q. Zhang, C. Li, J. Luan, G. Guan, J. Lin, F. Wang, et al., "Polycaprolactone/ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene partially absorbable suture with improved mechanical performances for tendon and ligament repair" Text. Res. J., vol. 90, pp. 2123-2135, 2020. [Crossref]
[13] J.H. Lin, C.T. Lu, C.H. He, C.C. Huang, C.W. Lou, "Preparation and evaluation of artificial bone complex material: Chitosan/polylactic complex braids" J. Compos. Mater., vol. 45, pp. 1945-1951, 2011. [Crossref]
[14] P. Zarrintaj, M.R. Saeb, S.H. Jafari, M. Mozafari, "Application of compatibilized polymer blends in biomedical fields," in Compatibilization of Polymer Blends, , Eds. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2020, pp. 511-537.
[15] A. Gopanna, K.P. Rajan, S.P. Thomas, M. Chavali, "Polyethylene and polypropylene matrix composites for biomedical applications," in Materials for Biomedical Engineering, , Eds. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2019, pp. 175-216.
[16] M. Akbari, A. Tamayol, V. Laforte, N. Annabi, A.H. Najafabadi, A. Khademhosseini, et al., "Composite living fibers for creating tissue constructs using textile techniques" Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 24, pp. 4060-4067, 2014. [Crossref]
[17] T.A.P. Nai, B. Aydin, H.S. Brand, R.E.G. Jonkman, "Present and theoretical applications of poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) in orthodontics: A scoping review" Materials, vol. 15, 2022. [Crossref]
[18] O. Başçı, U. Akgun, F.A. Barber, "Biological Properties of Suture Materials," in Knots in Orthopedic Surgery: Open and Arthroscopic Techniques, , Eds. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2017, pp. 11-20.
[19] O. Urbanek, M. Moczulska-Heljak, M. Wróbel, A. Mioduszewski, D. Kołbuk, "Advanced graft development approaches for ACL reconstruction or regeneration" Biomedicines, vol. 11, 2023. [Crossref]
[20] G.W. Melenka, C. Ayranci, "Advanced measurement techniques for braided composite structures: A review of current and upcoming trends" J. Compos. Mater., vol. 54, pp. 3895-3917, 2020. [Crossref]
[21] S.S. Roy, P. Potluri, "Braiding: From cordage to composites," in Proceedings of the Textile Research Conference, 29 October 2016, Dhaka, Bengal, pp. 1-4.
[22] C. Chang, B. Ginn, N.K. Livingston, Z. Yao, B. Slavin, M.W. King, et al., "Medical fibers and biotextiles," in Biomaterials Science (Fourth Edition). An Introduction to Materials in Medicine, , Eds. Cambridge, MA, USA: Academic Press, 2020, pp. 575-600.
[23] Ö.F. Turşucular, "Review on Biomedical Applications of Textile Surface Forms of PES Polymers" Am. J. Biomed. Sci. Res., vol. 22, pp. 543-549, 2024. [Crossref]
[24] R.C. de Guzman, "Materials for Orthopedic Applications. Orthopedic Biomaterials: Advances and Applications," in Orthopedic Biomaterials, B. Li and T. Webster, Eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2017, pp. 367-398.
[25] V. Hasirci, N. Hasirci, "Biomaterials and Devices in Hard Tissue Augmentation. Fundamentals of Biomaterials," in Fundamentals of Biomaterials, , Eds. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2018, pp. 219-232.
[26] S. Gorgieva, L.F. Zemljić, S. Strnad, V. Kokol, "Textile-based biomaterials for surgical applications," in Fundamental Biomaterials: Polymers, , Eds. Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2018, pp. 179-215.
[27] R. Vaishya, A.K. Agarwal, M. Tiwari, A. Vaish, V. Vijay, Y. Nigam, "Medical textiles in orthopedics: An overview" J. Clin. Orthop. Trauma, vol. 9, pp. S26-S33, 2018. [Crossref]
[28] P.K. Manvi, M. Beckers, B. Mohr, G. Seide, T. Thomas Gries, C.-A. Bunge, "Polymer fiber-based biocomposites for medical sensing applications," in Materials for Biomedical Engineering: Biopolymer Fibers, , Eds. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2019, pp. 57-88.
[29] G. Li, Y. Li, G. Chen, J. He, Y. Han, X. Wang, et al., "Silk-based biomaterials in biomedical textiles and fiber-based implants" Adv. Healthc. Mater., vol. 4, pp. 1134-1151, 2015. [Crossref]
[30] S.C.O. Ugbolue, "," in Polyolefin Fibres: Structure, Properties and Industrial Applications, , Eds. Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2017, pp. 1-590. ISBN-10: 0081011326, ISBN-13: 978-0081011324
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Learn more